Written by ENAIP NET
The place where young people live can significantly influence their access to education, training and employment. Local labour markets, transport connections, digital infrastructure and the availability of public services are not distributed equally across territories. Although place does not determine a young person’s future, it can make the transition from education to working life easier or more difficult.
The term NEET refers to young people who are neither in employment nor in education or training. Looking at NEET rates from a territorial perspective helps reveal inequalities that may remain hidden within national averages. This is particularly relevant for countries such as Italy, Spain and Greece, where national statistics may conceal considerable differences between regions, cities, suburbs and rural communities.
Eurostat classifies territories according to three degrees of urbanisation: cities, towns and suburbs, and rural areas. In 2025, 10.3% of young people aged 15–29 living in EU cities were NEET. The proportion increased to 11.0% in towns and suburbs and 12.2% in rural areas. These figures show that, at EU level, young people living outside cities remain more exposed to disconnection from employment, education and training.
At the same time, the situation is improving in several European countries. Between 2015 and 2025, Italy and Greece recorded two of the largest reductions in NEET rates in the EU. Nevertheless, progress at national level does not mean that all territories or groups of young people have benefited equally. Understanding local differences is therefore essential when designing effective responses.
The structure of the local labour market is one of the main factors. Cities generally offer a wider range of employers, professional networks and employment sectors. In rural or economically peripheral areas, opportunities may be limited to a smaller number of industries or depend on seasonal employment. Eurofound reports that employment rates are generally higher in urban areas and that the employment gap between rural and urban territories has slightly increased.
Access to education and training also varies. Young people in remote areas may have fewer schools, vocational training providers and specialised courses nearby. Attending these schools or trainings may require long journeys or relocation, creating additional financial and practical barriers. Rural residents also tend to have more limited access to high-speed internet, computers and digital skills, although online services are increasingly important for training, job searching and career guidance.
Transport can determine whether an opportunity is genuinely accessible. A job vacancy, training course or guidance service may formally exist within a region but remain difficult to reach when public transport is limited, expensive or incompatible with working hours. Territorial exclusion is therefore not only about the number of opportunities available, but also about whether young people can realistically access them.
Rural disadvantage should not lead to the assumption that all young people living in cities have equal opportunities. Young people in suburbs and peripheral neighbourhoods may live close to employment and training centres but remain poorly connected to them. Urban youth may also face precarious employment, high housing costs and unequal access to services and infrastructure. The OECD confirms that young people in cities continue to experience difficulties in accessing quality jobs, adequate housing and essential services.
Policies addressing NEET situations should therefore be adapted to local circumstances. Rural areas may benefit from improved transport, decentralised training, digital access and mobile guidance services. In suburbs and disadvantaged urban areas, priorities may include community outreach, stronger local services and better connections with education and employment opportunities. A single approach cannot respond effectively to such different territorial barriers.
For SupportSphere, this perspective highlights the importance of guidance that considers both individual aspirations and the environment in which a young person lives. Guidance professionals should understand local labour markets, identify transport and digital barriers and cooperate with schools, training providers, employers, employment services and social organisations. Personalised support is more effective when it connects individual needs with realistic and accessible opportunities.
References:
- Eurofound (2023), Bridging the rural–urban divide: Addressing inequalities and empowering communities. Publications Office of the European Union.
- Eurostat, Young persons neither in employment nor in education and training by degree of urbanisation. Dataset code edat_lfse_29, updated in 2026.
- Eurostat (2026), Statistics on young people neither in employment nor in education or training. Data referring to 2025.
- OECD (2026), Advancing Inclusive Growth in Cities for Youth. OECD Regional Development Papers, No. 192.
























